Quality Management

Quality Systems

Pragmatic Approach

Structured quality without ISO bureaucracy

Only the essential. Maximum impact.

Quality system focused on critical processes and continuous improvement. Without the complexity, cost and bureaucracy of ISO 9001 certification. Ideal for startups, SMEs and growing companies that need structured quality now.

3-4months
70%lower cost
No bureaucracy
What is it?

Quality Management: Practical quality without bureaucracy

Quality Management is a pragmatic quality system focused on critical processes and continuous improvement, without the complexity and cost of ISO 9001 certification. Unlike ISO 9001 which requires exhaustive documentation of all processes and mandatory external audits, Quality Management focuses only on the essential: processes that directly impact the quality of your product or service.

The system includes documentation of critical processes, quality controls, non-conformity management, key indicators (KPIs), and continuous improvement processes. Everything designed to be practical and useful, not to meet formal requirements. It's ideal for companies that need quality structure but aren't ready or don't need the formal ISO 9001 certification.

Key difference with ISO 9001: ISO 9001 is an international reference framework with strict requirements and mandatory external certification. Quality Management takes ISO 9001 quality principles but applies them pragmatically, without unnecessary bureaucracy. You can migrate to ISO 9001 later if needed, but many clients find Quality Management sufficient for their needs.

Who is it for

Who is Quality Management for?

Startup / SME

Growing company that needs quality structure without the bureaucracy of full ISO 9001.

Informal Quality

You have processes but they're not documented. You need structure without formal certification.

ISO Was Too Heavy

You tried ISO 9001 but it was too bureaucratic. You want practical and effective quality.

Future Preparation

You want to prepare your company for ISO certification later, but start with something pragmatic.

Continuous Improvement

You seek quality culture and continuous improvement without the formal rigor of ISO 9001.

Recurring Problems

You have recurring quality problems. You need a system to prevent and correct them.

Components

Quality System Components

Complete but pragmatic system with 6 essential components to ensure consistent quality.

Critical Processes Documented

Pragmatic documentation of key processes. Only the essential, without unnecessary bureaucracy.

Quality Controls

Defined control points in critical processes to ensure consistent quality.

Non-Conformity Management

System to identify, record, correct and prevent quality problems.

Quality Indicators (KPIs)

Key metrics to monitor quality performance and make data-driven decisions.

Continuous Improvement

Structured process to identify improvement opportunities and implement changes.

Quality Training

Team training in quality concepts and use of the implemented system.

Methodology

Our 5-Phase Methodology

PHASE 1Diagnosis1-2 weeks

Evaluation of current processes, identification of quality problems, mapping of critical processes and gap analysis.

PHASE 2System Design2-3 weeks

Design of pragmatic quality structure: processes to document, necessary controls, key indicators and workflows.

PHASE 3Pragmatic Documentation3-4 weeks

Documentation of critical processes, control procedures, record formats. Focus on utility, not formal compliance.

PHASE 4Implementation4-6 weeks

System launch: team training, control implementation, indicator establishment and adjustments based on feedback.

PHASE 5Institutionalization2-3 weeks

Ensure system sustainability: designation of responsible parties, establishment of review routines and knowledge transfer.

Measurable benefits

60-80%

less bureaucracy

vs full ISO 9001

3-4

months implementation

vs 6-12 months ISO

40-50%

problem reduction

consistent quality

100%

traceability

critical processes

70%

lower cost

vs ISO certification

Pragmático

approach

only essential

Comparison

Quality Management vs ISO 9001

Objective comparison to help you decide which approach is better for your company.

Aspect
Quality Management
ISO 9001
Documentation
Only critical processes
All processes (7 clauses)
Implementation Time
3-4 months
6-12 months
Cost
70% lower
High (certification + audits)
Bureaucracy
Minimal, pragmatic
High, formal
External Certification
Not required
Required (certifying body)
External Audits
Optional (internal)
Mandatory annual
Flexibility
High, adaptable
Low, strict
Ideal For
Startups, SMEs, growth
Established, regulated companies

Alternative Recommendation

For most startups, SMEs and growing companies, we recommend starting with Quality Management. It's faster, less expensive, and gives you quality structure without bureaucracy. If you later need ISO 9001 certification (due to client requirement or tender), the previous work significantly facilitates certification. For established or regulated companies that require certification, ISO 9001 is the right option.

Frequently Asked Questions

Quality Management is a pragmatic system focused on critical processes and continuous improvement, without the bureaucracy of ISO 9001. ISO 9001 requires complete documentation of all processes, mandatory external audits and formal certification. Quality Management gives you structure and quality without the cost and time of certification.

Yes, absolutely. In fact, it's an excellent strategy. You start with Quality Management to establish solid foundations without bureaucracy, and when your company is ready (more mature, with more resources, or if a client requires it), you migrate to ISO 9001. The previous work significantly facilitates certification.

Only the critical processes that directly impact the quality of your product or service. Typically: main production/service process, quality control, non-conformity management, and improvement processes. We don't document administrative or support processes unless they're critical to quality.

No, it's not required. Quality Management includes optional internal audits to verify the system works, but there's no obligation for external audits or certification. This significantly reduces costs and bureaucracy.

Typically 3-4 months from start to working system. Compared to 6-12 months for full ISO 9001. The difference is we focus only on the essential and avoid unnecessary documentation. Exact time depends on your company size and process complexity.

Depends on the specific requirement. If the client or tender explicitly requires ISO 9001 certification, then you need ISO. But many clients only require "quality system" or "documented processes", and Quality Management perfectly meets that. We help you evaluate your specific requirements.

Pragmatic system available

Need quality structure without bureaucracy?

Free quality maturity diagnosis. We evaluate your current situation and recommend whether Quality Management or ISO 9001 is better for you.

Current maturity assessment
Personalized recommendation
Implementation roadmap
Cost comparison